Farmland Management Update
I have put together another six page report related to work on our Willamette Valley land.
Again, this is full of nice pictures, so please download the pdf here and I hope you enjoy it.
I have put together another six page report related to work on our Willamette Valley land.
Again, this is full of nice pictures, so please download the pdf here and I hope you enjoy it.
First, I want you to see the video linked to below called “Cellgrazing.” It is short and fun to watch. (I recommend opening in a new window or tab so you can come right back to this post). Then I will explain why what you are seeing is important.
Cody Wood opens the electric fence, allowing 160 sheep to move from one acre to another.
Now let’s play a game of “What if?”
What if you brought a 10 year old kid to an all you can eat buffet and said, “Get whatever you want. I am not even going to look at your plate. Here’s $10. Eat up.”
Now, if you were to look at the plate what might you see? A perfectly well balanced diet, or heaps of fried chicken and chocolate éclairs?
What holds true for kids holds true for grazing livestock: It is best not to give them too much choice in what they eat, but instead guide them towards a balanced meal.
Most pastured livestock in the U.S. are managed akin to “free reign at the buffet.” Typically, a 50 acre field is stocked with a few hundred sheep or 50 cattle. They get a month or more on a field then are moved to another (often called “alternate grazing”). In that time the animals learn to seek out their favorite foods and avoid the areas of less tasty forage. A decline in pasture quality can really be quick—happening within a summer. For example, if the pasture originally was rich in clover that may be gone in late summer, with mostly tall fescue remaining. Come back in a few years and the less desired plants dominate the field all year long.
We avoid this problem by doing what is called intense rotational grazing, or cell grazing.
Cell grazing places the entire herd into a small area each day. At Fern Rd Farm, for example, we are giving the animals about 1 acre per day. Currently, all 160 sheep are restricted to these mobile paddocks. This equates to about 15,000 lbs of livestock per acre per day. On very well established, perennial pasture we could probably stock two to three times as intensively.
These 15,000 lbs of livestock will eat about 750 lbs of plant matter each day. Ideally, each paddock starts off with 2-3 times this amount of biomass so that after grazing enough residual biomass remains to rapidly rebuild standing biomass. It is a bit like interest growing in a bank account: residual biomass is like the remaining principal after a withdrawal, and as long as enough remains the account will quickly rebound to the former size. Over graze, however, and not enough principal will be there to rapidly regenerate.
Residual biomass after grazing is shown in the foreground, while the other side of the electric fence is actively grazed.
Forcing animals into a small space may also have a psychological effect on them. They sense the proximity of others and learn that this is all they are going to get for the day. This makes them less picky and more eager eaters—sort of like putting a casserole in front of 8 hungry brothers and saying “Here’s your supper.” The animals eagerly run from one paddock to the next, and (as the video above attests) it is a lot of fun to watch them begin eating with fervor.
This system also improves forage quality. Explaining this can get a bit technical, but I’ll try to make it clear.
Pasture experts talk about the S-curve. This refers to changes in the rate of growth of the stand of plants. When plants are very small, they put on only a small amount of biomass per time. But at a certain size, the amount they add each day increases rapidly. Of course any exponential rate of growth must end, and so growth slows and halts as the plants reach maturity. S-curves are common in all biological growth systems. What good pasture management does is keep animals eating as much of the pasture before it reaches the mature, no growth stage, but not so much that the pasture has a very long recovery time because the plants have been eaten back to the slow-growth portion of the S-curve.
Best management practices keep the pasture stand within stage 2 of the S-curve as much as possible.
It turns out that nutritional quality is best during this rapid growth phase too. Plants growing rapidly are full of readily digested sugars and proteins—you can literally taste this yourself when chewing on a grass blade. This makes sense since sugars and proteins are the building blocks of new cells and the growing plant is, by definition, building new cells at a rapid clip.
By contrast, an old plant is very sturdy with rigid cells that are not producing a lot of available sugars and proteins. Nutrients may be going down to the roots for winter storage, or into reproductive parts such as flowers and seeds. Well managed grazing delays the senescence process to yield more productivity as measured by captured sunlight and conversion to biomass each year.
This management system is not only more profitable on a per acre basis each year, but it also improves the soil over time.
Plants pulsing up and down the stage 2 portion of the growth curve are pumping carbon into the soil. Increasing soil organic matter is one of the best ways to add value to the land over time. Fields high in organic matter will buffer the water supply and keep nutrients from washing out during wet spells. I won’t get into the biophysical reasons for this, but it is like adding a layer of sponge to the soil, and when you walk on the fields it may even feel spongy.
Cell grazing is a great example of applied science—the reasons why it works are well understood from basic principles of plant biology and ecology—but getting it right in practice takes a great deal of expertise and skill. My job as farmland manager for Farmland LP is to make sure we put together the farm infrastructure and on-farm skilled practitioners to improve the land while producing healthy food and steady income.
from -> Methods
Our investors have often asked whether organic farming methods result in a yield differential vs. crops produced by conventional farming methods. Would a large scale return to organic farming methods result in decreased yields and, ultimately, food shortages both domestic and abroad?
Fortunately, the research shows that organic farmland delivers both superior long term crop yields and superior economics.
Earlier this year, the Long Term Agroecological Research (LTAR) program in Greenfield, Iowa published the results of a 12 year long study comparing the performance between crops conforming to the USDA’s National Organic Program and conventional crops. Dr. Kathleen Delate, associate professor of Iowa State University, led the study in collaboration with the USDA-ARS Soil Tilth Lab and the ISU Experiment Station. The team divided farmland into 44 quarter-acre plots and studied performance parameters which included soil quality, fertility, nitrogen utilization, weed control, insect and disease pressure and control, and – of course – yields.

An overhead view of the Iowa State University plots
While the organic plots were initially less productive, by the third year they had caught up with the conventional plots in terms of yield. In the fourth year, the organic crops surpassed the conventional crops.
Over the 12 years, the average yields between the two farming methods have been neck in neck across different crops. However, the average production costs for the conventional crops were approximately $50 per acre higher than organic. Organic crop farming did not use petroleum-based herbicides, fungicides or insecticides. As a result, the organic crops returned, on average, double the revenue of the conventional crops over the course of the project.
The team’s conclusion was that the increased yields and reduced input costs of the organic farming methods translated into significant cost savings: the revenue from the organic plots could be more than twice that of conventional. These outcomes point to a significant difference in the amount of time it takes to break-even on investments in organic farms versus conventional ones. Similar results have come from studies by the Sustainable Agriculture Farming Systems project (SAFS) at UC Davis and the Farming Systems Trial at the Rodale Institute: organic, sustainable farming methods result in comparable yields, greater profitability, and increased soil fertility.
Studies conducted in the developing world show even more promise. In 2007, Catherine Badgley of the University of Michigan published research that concluded: “Organic farming can yield up to three times as much food on individual farms in developing countries, as low-intensive methods on the same land,‖ a finding she says “refute[s] the long-standing claim that organic farming methods cannot produce enough food to feed the global population.” The significant increase in yield exists because many developing world farmers still do not have access to expensive fertilizers and pesticides.
Converting farmland to certified organic production requires a minimum three-year transition and certification process. Starting at the beginning of the certification process, only organic materials can be used on the farm, usually resulting in decreased yields during the transition period while the natural soil fertility is restored. Artificial fertilizers are like amphetamines – giving a short-term boost of productivity but eventually burning out the land. It takes specialized knowledge and hard work to rehabilitate soil to its previous natural health and vitality – and that’s where Farmland LP comes in. We restore the land’s health and achieve high yields through soil management, crop diversity and ecological synergy.
By converting land to organic, sustainable farming methods, Farmland LP lowers input costs, increases revenues, conserves nonrenewable resources including fuel and natural-gas-based fertilizer, reduces use of toxic materials such as pesticides and herbicides, and enhances the long term value of the land through improved soil quality and enhanced water retention.
Organic farming using sustainable-agriculture best practices is a robust business model, delivering superior economics over conventional farming on a wide variety of metrics such as crop yields, gross and net income per acre, cost of inputs, per farm income and more. Although it takes time to convert the land, once done, it delivers payback in perpetuity. And each acre converted to organic, sustainable methods is one acre closer to a societal tipping point for sustainability.
from -> Economics